Search for: All records

Abstract As science becomes ever more collaborative, the mechanisms for working in large and more diverse groups become more necessary. In the present article, I explore the utility of within-group collaboration agreements on participant conduct toward other project participants, within-group data sharing, and authorship of published manuscripts for research groups. Such agreements can solidify the expectations of the interactions among collaborators, potential rewards, and a feeling of security for those involved in the projects. They could also lead to more productive and satisfying research, as well as improving the training of future scientists. 

Abstract Gas transfer velocity () controls gas fluxes between aquatic ecosystems and the atmosphere. In streams, is controlled by turbulence and, thus, local hydrology and geomorphology. Resultantly, variability in can be large and modeling from physical parameters can have large uncertainty. Here, we leverage a large dataset of estimates derived from tracer‐gas experiments in 22 US streams across a range of discharges. Our analysis shows that was highly variable both spatially across and temporally within streams, with estimates of spanning three orders of magnitude. Overall, scaled with discharge in steep streams due to relatively high stream power, but not in low‐slope streams, where stream power was relatively low even at high flows. Understanding how responds to stream discharge in a wide variety of streams is key to creating temporally and spatially resolved estimates of biogeochemical processes in streams. 

Abstract Riparian zones are a critical terrestrial‐aquatic ecotone. They play important roles in ecosystems including (1) harboring biodiversity, (2) influencing light and carbon fluxes to aquatic food webs, (3) maintaining water quality and streamflow, (4) enhancing aquatic habitat, (5) influencing greenhouse gas production, and (6) sequestering carbon. Defining what qualifies as a riparian zone is a first step to delineation. Many definitions of riparian boundaries focus on static attributes or a subset of potential functions without recognizing that they are spatially continuous, temporally dynamic, and multi‐dimensional. We emphasize that definitions should consider multiple ecological and biogeochemical functions and physical gradients, and explore how this approach influences spatial characterization of riparian zones. One or more of the following properties can guide riparian delineation: (1) distinct species, elevated biodiversity, or species with specific adaptations to flooding and inundation near streams relative to nearby upland areas; (2) unique vegetation structure directly influencing irradiance or organic material inputs to aquatic ecosystems; (3) hydrologic and geomorphic features or processes maintaining floodplains; (4) hydric soil properties that differ from the uplands; and/or (5) elevated retention of dissolved and suspended materials relative to adjacent uplands. Considering these properties for an operational and dynamic definition of riparian zones recognizes that riparian boundaries vary in space (e.g., variation of riparian corridor widths within or among watersheds) and time (e.g., responses to hydrological variance and climate change). Inclusive definitions addressing multiple riparian functions could facilitate attainment of research and management goals by linking properties of interest to specific outcomes. 

Abstract Understanding the complex and unpredictable ways ecosystems are changing and predicting the state of ecosystems and the services they will provide in the future requires coordinated, long‐term research. This paper is a product of a U.S. National Science Foundation funded Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) network synthesis effort that addressed anticipated changes in future populations and communities. Each LTER site described what their site would look like in 50 or 100 yr based on long‐term patterns and responses to global change drivers in each ecosystem. Common themes emerged and predictions were grouped into state change, connectivity, resilience, time lags, and cascading effects. Here, we report on the “state change” theme, which includes examples from the Georgia Coastal (coastal marsh), Konza Prairie (mesic grassland), Luquillo (tropical forest), Sevilleta (arid grassland), and Virginia Coastal (coastal grassland) sites. Ecological thresholds (the point at which small changes in an environmental driver can produce an abrupt and persistent state change in an ecosystem quality, property, or phenomenon) were most commonly predicted. For example, in coastal ecosystems, sea‐level rise and climate change could convert salt marsh to mangroves and coastal barrier dunes to shrub thicket. Reduced fire frequency has converted grassland to shrubland in mesic prairie, whereas overgrazing combined with drought drive shrub encroachment in arid grasslands. Lastly, tropical cloud forests are susceptible to climate‐induced changes in cloud base altitude leading to shifts in species distributions. Overall, these examples reveal that state change is a likely outcome of global environmental change across a diverse range of ecosystems and highlight the need for long‐term studies to sort out the causes and consequences of state change. The diversity of sites within the LTER network facilitates the emergence of overarching concepts about state changes as an important driver of ecosystem structure, function, services, and futures.